2010-11 BIG EAST Women's Basketball

Conference-Only Statistics


 

CONFERENCE BASKETBALL STATISTICS

 

SCORING OFFENSE G W-L Pts Avg/G
1. Connecticut 16 16-0 1196 74.8
2. Notre Dame 16 13-3 1168 73.0
3. DePaul 16 13-3 1103 68.9
4. Louisville 16 10-6 1032 64.5
5. Syracuse 16 9-7 1003 62.7
6. Marquette 16 10-6 998 62.4
7. Georgetown 16 9-7 987 61.7
8. West Virginia 16 8-8 982 61.4
9. St. John's 16 9-7 979 61.2
10. Pittsburgh 16 5-11 971 60.7
11. Rutgers 16 11-5 942 58.9
12. USF 16 3-13 912 57.0
13. Seton Hall 16 1-15 829 51.8
14. Providence 16 6-10 813 50.8
15. Villanova 16 3-13 786 49.1
16. Cincinnati 16 2-14 743 46.4
 
SCORING DEFENSE G Pts Avg/G
1. Connecticut 16 815 50.9
2. Rutgers 16 848 53.0
3. Notre Dame 16 883 55.2
4. Georgetown 16 931 58.2
5. DePaul 16 933 58.3
6. West Virginia 16 937 58.6
Villanova 16 937 58.6
8. Louisville 16 953 59.6
9. Providence 16 958 59.9
10. St. John's 16 983 61.4
11. Syracuse 16 1003 62.7
12. Marquette 16 1013 63.3
13. Cincinnati 16 1043 65.2
14. Pittsburgh 16 1056 66.0
15. Seton Hall 16 1068 66.8
16. USF 16 1083 67.7
 
SCORING MARGIN G Offense Defense Margin
1. Connecticut 16 74.8 50.9 +23.8
2. Notre Dame 16 73.0 55.2 +17.8
3. DePaul 16 68.9 58.3 +10.6
4. Rutgers 16 58.9 53.0 +5.9
5. Louisville 16 64.5 59.6 +4.9
6. Georgetown 16 61.7 58.2 +3.5
7. West Virginia 16 61.4 58.6 +2.8
8. Syracuse 16 62.7 62.7 +0.0
9. St. John's 16 61.2 61.4 -0.2
10. Marquette 16 62.4 63.3 -0.9
11. Pittsburgh 16 60.7 66.0 -5.3
12. Providence 16 50.8 59.9 -9.1
13. Villanova 16 49.1 58.6 -9.4
14. USF 16 57.0 67.7 -10.7
15. Seton Hall 16 51.8 66.8 -14.9
16. Cincinnati 16 46.4 65.2 -18.8
 
FREE THROW PCT G FTM FTA Pct
1. Villanova 16 104 131 .794
2. Connecticut 16 224 297 .754
3. Marquette 16 236 313 .754
4. Louisville 16 188 262 .718
5. Pittsburgh 16 221 310 .713
6. West Virginia 16 236 334 .707
7. Syracuse 16 258 369 .699
8. Notre Dame 16 279 400 .698
9. St. John's 16 203 297 .684
10. Seton Hall 16 179 263 .681
11. Rutgers 16 192 283 .678
12. DePaul 16 150 226 .664
13. Georgetown 16 161 246 .654
14. USF 16 170 263 .646
15. Providence 16 124 195 .636
16. Cincinnati 16 122 201 .607
 
FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGES G FGM FGA Pct
1. Connecticut 16 438 864 .507
2. Notre Dame 16 418 890 .470
3. St. John's 16 364 844 .431
4. DePaul 16 419 972 .431
5. Louisville 16 368 863 .426
6. Rutgers 16 341 809 .422
7. West Virginia 16 343 853 .402
8. Marquette 16 339 849 .399
9. Georgetown 16 358 919 .390
10. Pittsburgh 16 335 873 .384
11. Syracuse 16 336 879 .382
12. Villanova 16 283 792 .357
13. USF 16 337 945 .357
14. Providence 16 314 893 .352
15. Cincinnati 16 260 782 .332
16. Seton Hall 16 285 877 .325
 
FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE G FGM FGA Pct
1. Connecticut 16 300 923 .325
2. Rutgers 16 296 845 .350
3. Notre Dame 16 318 848 .375
4. West Virginia 16 315 828 .380
5. Pittsburgh 16 369 951 .388
6. Syracuse 16 355 910 .390
7. Georgetown 16 305 781 .391
8. DePaul 16 335 844 .397
9. St. John's 16 373 927 .402
10. Louisville 16 343 838 .409
11. Marquette 16 383 928 .413
12. Providence 16 344 818 .421
13. Villanova 16 352 833 .423
14. Cincinnati 16 392 921 .426
15. Seton Hall 16 389 878 .443
16. USF 16 369 831 .444
 
3-POINT FG PCT G 3FGM 3FGA Pct
1. Connecticut 16 96 242 .397
2. Notre Dame 16 53 137 .387
3. DePaul 16 115 325 .354
4. St. John's 16 48 137 .350
5. Louisville 16 108 313 .345
6. Rutgers 16 68 199 .342
7. Marquette 16 84 256 .328
8. Seton Hall 16 80 247 .324
9. Georgetown 16 110 348 .316
10. Cincinnati 16 101 324 .312
11. USF 16 68 225 .302
12. Pittsburgh 16 80 270 .296
13. West Virginia 16 60 204 .294
14. Syracuse 16 73 257 .284
15. Villanova 16 116 412 .282
16. Providence 16 61 222 .275
 
3-POINT FG PCT DEFENSE G 3FGM 3FGA Pct
1. Providence 16 57 207 .275
2. DePaul 16 65 232 .280
3. Connecticut 16 87 300 .290
4. Louisville 16 83 284 .292
5. Notre Dame 16 65 213 .305
6. Pittsburgh 16 81 264 .307
7. Georgetown 16 92 299 .308
8. USF 16 76 234 .325
9. Rutgers 16 97 297 .327
10. St. John's 16 89 271 .328
11. Seton Hall 16 87 262 .332
12. Marquette 16 100 295 .339
13. Villanova 16 58 170 .341
14. West Virginia 16 72 206 .350
15. Syracuse 16 109 302 .361
16. Cincinnati 16 103 282 .365
 
REBOUNDING OFFENSE G Rebounds Avg/G
1. Syracuse 16 657 41.1
2. Connecticut 16 644 40.2
3. Notre Dame 16 628 39.2
4. Pittsburgh 16 598 37.4
5. DePaul 16 583 36.4
6. West Virginia 16 582 36.4
7. USF 16 575 35.9
8. Georgetown 16 569 35.6
9. Rutgers 16 565 35.3
10. Marquette 16 563 35.2
11. Providence 16 549 34.3
12. Seton Hall 16 523 32.7
13. St. John's 16 522 32.6
14. Louisville 16 505 31.6
15. Cincinnati 16 503 31.4
16. Villanova 16 437 27.3
 
REBOUNDING DEFENSE G Rebounds Avg/G
1. Connecticut 16 466 29.1
2. Notre Dame 16 500 31.3
3. Rutgers 16 526 32.9
4. West Virginia 16 535 33.4
5. Syracuse 16 538 33.6
6. Marquette 16 546 34.1
7. Louisville 16 557 34.8
8. Georgetown 16 567 35.4
9. DePaul 16 568 35.5
10. Providence 16 583 36.4
11. St. John's 16 590 36.9
12. Cincinnati 16 592 37.0
13. Villanova 16 600 37.5
14. USF 16 605 37.8
15. Pittsburgh 16 611 38.2
16. Seton Hall 16 619 38.7
 
REBOUNDING MARGIN G Team Avg. Opponent Avg. Margin
1. Connecticut 16 644 40.2 466 29.1 +11.1
2. Notre Dame 16 628 39.2 500 31.3 +8.0
3. Syracuse 16 657 41.1 538 33.6 +7.4
4. West Virginia 16 582 36.4 535 33.4 +2.9
5. Rutgers 16 565 35.3 526 32.9 +2.4
6. Marquette 16 563 35.2 546 34.1 +1.1
7. DePaul 16 583 36.4 568 35.5 +0.9
8. Georgetown 16 569 35.6 567 35.4 +0.1
9. Pittsburgh 16 598 37.4 611 38.2 -0.8
10. USF 16 575 35.9 605 37.8 -1.9
11. Providence 16 549 34.3 583 36.4 -2.1
12. Louisville 16 505 31.6 557 34.8 -3.2
13. St. John's 16 522 32.6 590 36.9 -4.2
14. Cincinnati 16 503 31.4 592 37.0 -5.6
15. Seton Hall 16 523 32.7 619 38.7 -6.0
16. Villanova 16 437 27.3 600 37.5 -10.2
 
BLOCKED SHOTS G No. Avg/G
1. Pittsburgh 16 81 5.1
West Virginia 16 81 5.1
3. Rutgers 16 72 4.5
4. Connecticut 16 67 4.2
5. Notre Dame 16 65 4.1
6. Syracuse 16 63 3.9
7. DePaul 16 59 3.7
8. USF 16 55 3.4
9. St. John's 16 54 3.4
10. Providence 16 53 3.3
11. Louisville 16 45 2.8
12. Georgetown 16 41 2.6
13. Villanova 16 38 2.4
14. Marquette 16 37 2.3
15. Seton Hall 16 30 1.9
16. Cincinnati 16 27 1.7
 
ASSISTS G No. Avg/G
1. Connecticut 16 297 18.6
2. DePaul 16 275 17.2
3. Notre Dame 16 255 15.9
4. Marquette 16 237 14.8
Georgetown 16 237 14.8
6. Louisville 16 215 13.4
7. Pittsburgh 16 205 12.8
8. Rutgers 16 200 12.5
9. Villanova 16 199 12.4
10. St. John's 16 194 12.1
11. Syracuse 16 186 11.6
12. USF 16 181 11.3
13. West Virginia 16 179 11.2
14. Providence 16 177 11.1
15. Cincinnati 16 167 10.4
16. Seton Hall 16 155 9.7
 
STEALS G No. Avg/G
1. Notre Dame 16 188 11.8
2. Georgetown 16 164 10.3
3. DePaul 16 157 9.8
4. Louisville 16 154 9.6
5. West Virginia 16 145 9.1
6. St. John's 16 128 8.0
7. Connecticut 16 123 7.7
Rutgers 16 123 7.7
9. Marquette 16 121 7.6
10. Syracuse 16 116 7.3
11. USF 16 115 7.2
12. Providence 16 113 7.1
13. Seton Hall 16 110 6.9
14. Villanova 16 97 6.1
15. Cincinnati 16 87 5.4
16. Pittsburgh 16 75 4.7
 
TURNOVER MARGIN G Team Avg. Opponent Avg. Margin
1. Notre Dame 16 285 17.8 351 21.9 +4.12
2. DePaul 16 237 14.8 300 18.8 +3.94
3. Georgetown 16 268 16.8 328 20.5 +3.75
4. Louisville 16 286 17.9 337 21.1 +3.19
5. St. John's 16 261 16.3 281 17.6 +1.25
6. USF 16 233 14.6 235 14.7 +0.12
7. West Virginia 16 295 18.4 295 18.4 +0.00
8. Connecticut 16 252 15.8 251 15.7 -0.06
9. Providence 16 275 17.2 273 17.1 -0.12
10. Rutgers 16 256 16.0 253 15.8 -0.19
11. Seton Hall 16 285 17.8 271 16.9 -0.88
12. Villanova 16 230 14.4 214 13.4 -1.00
13. Marquette 16 274 17.1 251 15.7 -1.44
14. Syracuse 16 307 19.2 261 16.3 -2.88
15. Pittsburgh 16 281 17.6 215 13.4 -4.13
16. Cincinnati 16 288 18.0 197 12.3 -5.69
 
ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO G Assist Avg. T-Over Avg. Ratio
1. Connecticut 16 297 18.6 252 15.8 1.2
2. DePaul 16 275 17.2 237 14.8 1.2
3. Notre Dame 16 255 15.9 285 17.8 0.9
4. Georgetown 16 237 14.8 268 16.8 0.9
5. Villanova 16 199 12.4 230 14.4 0.9
6. Marquette 16 237 14.8 274 17.1 0.9
7. Rutgers 16 200 12.5 256 16.0 0.8
8. USF 16 181 11.3 233 14.6 0.8
9. Louisville 16 215 13.4 286 17.9 0.8
10. St. John's 16 194 12.1 261 16.3 0.7
11. Pittsburgh 16 205 12.8 281 17.6 0.7
12. Providence 16 177 11.1 275 17.2 0.6
13. West Virginia 16 179 11.2 295 18.4 0.6
14. Syracuse 16 186 11.6 307 19.2 0.6
15. Cincinnati 16 167 10.4 288 18.0 0.6
16. Seton Hall 16 155 9.7 285 17.8 0.5
 
OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS G No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 16 263 16.4
2. USF 16 247 15.4
3. Notre Dame 16 233 14.6
4. Georgetown 16 230 14.4
5. DePaul 16 226 14.1
6. Seton Hall 16 219 13.7
7. West Virginia 16 217 13.6
8. Pittsburgh 16 207 12.9
Providence 16 207 12.9
10. Marquette 16 199 12.4
11. Cincinnati 16 185 11.6
12. Connecticut 16 181 11.3
13. Rutgers 16 179 11.2
14. St. John's 16 173 10.8
15. Louisville 16 169 10.6
16. Villanova 16 102 6.4
 
DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS G No. Avg/G
1. Connecticut 16 463 28.9
2. Notre Dame 16 395 24.7
3. Syracuse 16 394 24.6
4. Pittsburgh 16 391 24.4
5. Rutgers 16 386 24.1
6. West Virginia 16 365 22.8
7. Marquette 16 364 22.8
8. DePaul 16 357 22.3
9. St. John's 16 349 21.8
10. Providence 16 342 21.4
11. Georgetown 16 339 21.2
12. Louisville 16 336 21.0
13. Villanova 16 335 20.9
14. USF 16 328 20.5
15. Cincinnati 16 318 19.9
16. Seton Hall 16 304 19.0
 
DEFENSIVE REB PCT. G Team D-Reb Opp. O-REb D-Reb Pct.
1. Connecticut 16 463 182 .718
2. Notre Dame 16 395 198 .666
3. Rutgers 16 386 200 .659
4. Syracuse 16 394 206 .657
5. Providence 16 342 180 .655
6. West Virginia 16 365 194 .653
7. Marquette 16 364 198 .648
8. Villanova 16 335 184 .645
9. Georgetown 16 339 190 .641
10. DePaul 16 357 201 .640
11. USF 16 328 192 .631
12. Louisville 16 336 203 .623
13. Pittsburgh 16 391 238 .622
14. St. John's 16 349 233 .600
15. Cincinnati 16 318 220 .591
16. Seton Hall 16 304 218 .582
 
OFFENSIVE REB PCT. G Team O-Reb Opp. D-Reb O-Reb Pct.
1. Syracuse 16 263 332 .442
2. Notre Dame 16 233 302 .436
3. Connecticut 16 181 284 .389
4. West Virginia 16 217 341 .389
5. DePaul 16 226 367 .381
6. Georgetown 16 230 377 .379
7. USF 16 247 413 .374
8. Marquette 16 199 348 .364
9. Pittsburgh 16 207 373 .357
10. Rutgers 16 179 326 .354
11. Seton Hall 16 219 401 .353
12. Providence 16 207 403 .339
13. Cincinnati 16 185 372 .332
14. St. John's 16 173 357 .326
15. Louisville 16 169 354 .323
16. Villanova 16 102 416 .197
 
3-POINT FG MADE G No. Avg/G
1. Villanova 16 116 7.3
2. DePaul 16 115 7.2
3. Georgetown 16 110 6.9
4. Louisville 16 108 6.8
5. Cincinnati 16 101 6.3
6. Connecticut 16 96 6.0
7. Marquette 16 84 5.3
8. Seton Hall 16 80 5.0
Pittsburgh 16 80 5.0
10. Syracuse 16 73 4.6
11. USF 16 68 4.3
Rutgers 16 68 4.3
13. Providence 16 61 3.8
14. West Virginia 16 60 3.8
15. Notre Dame 16 53 3.3
16. St. John's 16 48 3.0
 


Standings Conference Pct. PF PA   Overall Pct. PF PA   Home Away Neutral Last 10 Streak
Connecticut 16-0 1.000 74.8 50.9   16-0 1.000 74.8 50.9
Notre Dame 13-3 .813 73.0 55.2   13-3 .813 73.0 55.2
DePaul 13-3 .813 68.9 58.3   13-3 .813 68.9 58.3
Rutgers 11-5 .688 58.9 53.0   11-5 .688 58.9 53.0
Louisville 10-6 .625 64.5 59.6   10-6 .625 64.5 59.6
Marquette 10-6 .625 62.4 63.3   10-6 .625 62.4 63.3
Syracuse 9-7 .563 62.7 62.7   9-7 .563 62.7 62.7
Georgetown 9-7 .563 61.7 58.2   9-7 .563 61.7 58.2
St. John's 9-7 .563 61.2 61.4   9-7 .563 61.2 61.4
West Virginia 8-8 .500 61.4 58.6   8-8 .500 61.4 58.6
Providence 6-10 .375 50.8 59.9   6-10 .375 50.8 59.9
Pittsburgh 5-11 .313 60.7 66.0   5-11 .313 60.7 66.0
USF 3-13 .188 57.0 67.7   3-13 .188 57.0 67.7
Villanova 3-13 .188 49.1 58.6   3-13 .188 49.1 58.6
Cincinnati 2-14 .125 46.4 65.2   2-14 .125 46.4 65.2
Seton Hall 1-15 .063 51.8 66.8   1-15 .063 51.8 66.8
 
Winning streak No.
Connecticut 16
Rutgers 4
USF 2
West Virginia 1
Providence 1
Villanova 1
DePaul 1
Cincinnati 1
 
TEAM SUMMARIES G PF-PA Avg score Margin FG-FGA Pct. 3FG-FGA Pct. FT-FTA Pct. RebF RebA Margin
Cincinnati 16 743-1043 46.4-65.2 -18.7 260-782 .332 101-324 .312 122-201 .607 503 592 -5.6
Connecticut 16 1196-815 74.8-50.9 +23.8 438-864 .507 96-242 .397 224-297 .754 644 466 +11.1
DePaul 16 1103-933 68.9-58.3 +10.6 419-972 .431 115-325 .354 150-226 .664 583 568 +0.9
Georgetown 16 987-931 61.7-58.2 +3.5 358-919 .390 110-348 .316 161-246 .654 569 567 +0.1
Louisville 16 1032-953 64.5-59.6 +4.9 368-863 .426 108-313 .345 188-262 .718 505 557 -3.2
Marquette 16 998-1013 62.4-63.3 -0.9 339-849 .399 84-256 .328 236-313 .754 563 546 +1.1
Notre Dame 16 1168-883 73.0-55.2 +17.8 418-890 .470 53-137 .387 279-400 .698 628 500 +8.0
Pittsburgh 16 971-1056 60.7-66.0 -5.3 335-873 .384 80-270 .296 221-310 .713 598 611 -0.8
Providence 16 813-958 50.8-59.9 -9.1 314-893 .352 61-222 .275 124-195 .636 549 583 -2.1
Rutgers 16 942-848 58.9-53.0 +5.9 341-809 .422 68-199 .342 192-283 .678 565 526 +2.4
Seton Hall 16 829-1068 51.8-66.8 -14.9 285-877 .325 80-247 .324 179-263 .681 523 619 -6.0
St. John's 16 979-983 61.2-61.4 -0.2 364-844 .431 48-137 .350 203-297 .684 522 590 -4.2
Syracuse 16 1003-1003 62.7-62.7 +0.0 336-879 .382 73-257 .284 258-369 .699 657 538 +7.4
USF 16 912-1083 57.0-67.7 -10.7 337-945 .357 68-225 .302 170-263 .646 575 605 -1.9
Villanova 16 786-937 49.1-58.6 -9.4 283-792 .357 116-412 .282 104-131 .794 437 600 -10.2
West Virginia 16 982-937 61.4-58.6 +2.8 343-853 .402 60-204 .294 236-334 .707 582 535 +2.9
 
ATTENDANCE Home Avg   Away Avg   Neutral Avg   Total attend Avg
Cincinnati 8-6478 810   8-29612 3702   0-0 0   16-36090 2256
Connecticut 8-81246 10156   8-39431 4929   0-0 0   16-120677 7542
DePaul 8-25238 3155   8-26082 3260   0-0 0   16-51320 3208
Georgetown 8-10488 1311   8-27840 3480   0-0 0   16-38328 2396
Louisville 8-83133 10392   8-29732 3716   0-0 0   16-112865 7054
Marquette 8-13012 1626   8-18699 2337   0-0 0   16-31711 1982
Notre Dame 8-69137 8642   8-24610 3076   0-0 0   16-93747 5859
Pittsburgh 8-22430 2804   8-33988 4248   0-0 0   16-56418 3526
Providence 8-3846 481   8-11824 1478   0-0 0   16-15670 979
Rutgers 8-26829 3354   8-32527 4066   0-0 0   16-59356 3710
Seton Hall 8-4116 514   8-34767 4346   0-0 0   16-38883 2430
St. John's 8-15718 1965   8-22180 2772   0-0 0   16-37898 2369
Syracuse 8-9510 1189   8-29650 3706   0-0 0   16-39160 2448
USF 8-10320 1290   8-13738 1717   0-0 0   16-24058 1504
Villanova 8-8020 1002   8-17465 2183   0-0 0   16-25485 1593
West Virginia 8-30709 3839   8-28085 3511   0-0 0   16-58794 3675
Totals 128-420230 3283   128-420230 3283   0-0 0   256-840460 3283  
 


 

INDIVIDUAL BASKETBALL STATISTICS

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 75.0% of their team's games.

SCORING Cl GP FG 3FG FT Points Avg/G
1. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 133 24 64 354 22.1
2. RODGERS, Sugar-GU SO 16 100 47 46 293 18.3
3. SMITH, Andrea-USF 16 98 23 62 281 17.6
4. HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT SR 16 95 33 39 262 16.4
5. REID, Monique-LOU JR 16 102 0 57 261 16.3
6. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 72 43 42 229 15.3
7. HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU JR 16 79 31 50 239 14.9
REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 84 35 36 239 14.9
9. NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND JR 16 73 8 77 231 14.4
10. DIGGINS, Skylar-ND SO 16 71 12 75 229 14.3
11. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 65 12 72 214 13.4
12. ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 70 0 70 210 13.1
13. OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 79 0 51 209 13.1
14. ULIS, Shareese-CIN SR 16 70 44 24 208 13.0
15. PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 87 0 32 206 12.9
16. ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 73 4 55 205 12.8
17. CREW, Jasmine-SHU JR 15 71 18 27 187 12.5
18. HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN FR 16 74 33 18 199 12.4
19. HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN JR 16 62 25 48 197 12.3
20. SYKES, April-RU JR 16 75 34 12 196 12.3
21. SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU FR 16 67 41 16 191 11.9
22. SMITH, Shenneika-STJ SO 16 77 5 30 189 11.8
23. HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU JR 16 67 0 53 187 11.7
24. STEVENS, Da'Shena-STJ JR 16 73 0 35 181 11.3
25. CHESTER, Felicia-DPU SR 16 73 1 32 179 11.2
26. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 52 1 69 174 10.9
27. SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 67 6 32 172 10.8
28. DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN FR 16 72 0 27 171 10.7
29. MCNUTT, Monica-GU SR 16 58 33 21 170 10.6
SIMS, Jania-PITT SR 16 51 11 57 170 10.6
 
REBOUNDING Cl GP Off Def Total Avg/G
1. COLE, Chelsea-PITT SR 16 58 111 169 10.6
2. PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 55 71 126 7.9
3. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 37 86 123 7.7
4. GRANT, Porche-USF 14 53 53 106 7.6
5. WRIGHT, Teya-PC SR 16 55 64 119 7.4
6. HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU JR 16 47 67 114 7.1
7. LEE, Chelsey-RU JR 16 38 75 113 7.1
ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 40 73 113 7.1
9. FARIS, Kelly-UCONN SO 16 17 93 110 6.9
10. CHESTER, Felicia-DPU SR 16 45 61 106 6.6
11. OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 40 64 104 6.5
12. HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC SR 16 29 74 103 6.4
13. PIKES, Taylor-DPU JR 16 40 62 102 6.4
14. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 21 80 101 6.3
SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 18 83 101 6.3
16. RANDOLPH, Jeanise-CIN FR 16 43 57 100 6.3
17. REID, Monique-LOU JR 16 43 54 97 6.1
ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 43 54 97 6.1
19. TYSON-THOMAS, Carmen-SU SO 16 37 55 92 5.8
HINES, Keshia-LOU SR 16 40 52 92 5.8
SCOTT, Shayla-PITT SR 16 22 70 92 5.8
 
FIELD GOAL PCT Cl GP FG FGA Pct
1. PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 87 140 .621
2. DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN FR 16 72 118 .610
3. REID, Monique-LOU JR 16 102 181 .564
4. PIKES, Taylor-DPU JR 16 57 102 .559
5. CHESTER, Felicia-DPU SR 16 73 134 .545
6. OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 79 148 .534
7. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 133 250 .532
8. LEE, Chelsey-RU JR 16 60 114 .526
9. BRUSZEWSKI, Becca-ND SR 16 64 122 .525
10. COLLINS, Jasmine-MU SR 15 49 96 .510
11. ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 70 139 .504
12. HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN FR 16 74 149 .497
13. ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 73 149 .490
14. HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU JR 16 67 138 .486
15. COLE, Chelsea-PITT SR 16 63 133 .474
 
ASSISTS Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 96 6.0
2. WRIGHT, Rubylee-GU JR 16 89 5.6
3. McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ SO 16 85 5.3
4. SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU FR 16 82 5.1
5. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 76 4.8
6. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 75 4.7
7. DIGGINS, Skylar-ND SO 16 73 4.6
8. MILES,Sarah-WVU SR 15 65 4.3
9. FARIS, Kelly-UCONN SO 16 62 3.9
QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU SR 16 62 3.9
11. HARRIS, Tasha-SU SR 16 61 3.8
12. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 53 3.5
13. WELLS, Lola-PC JR 16 53 3.3
14. HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN JR 16 52 3.3
15. MALLORY, Brittany-ND SR 16 49 3.1
DIXON, Lorin-UCONN SR 16 49 3.1
 
FREE THROW PCT Cl GP FT FTA Pct
1. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 42 45 .933
2. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 64 73 .877
3. RODGERS, Sugar-GU SO 16 46 53 .868
4. McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ SO 16 52 61 .852
5. SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 32 38 .842
6. REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 36 45 .800
7. SIMS, Jania-PITT SR 16 57 72 .792
8. WRIGHT, Teya-PC SR 16 34 43 .791
9. ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 55 70 .786
10. REID, Monique-LOU JR 16 57 74 .770
11. ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 70 91 .769
HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU JR 16 50 65 .769
13. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 72 94 .766
14. DIGGINS, Skylar-ND SO 16 75 98 .765
15. NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND JR 16 77 102 .755
 
STEALS Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. RODGERS, Sugar-GU SO 16 43 2.7
2. GIBBS, Tia-LOU SO 16 40 2.5
3. MALLORY, Brittany-ND SR 16 36 2.3
4. SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 35 2.2
5. SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU FR 16 34 2.1
6. MILES,Sarah-WVU SR 15 31 2.1
7. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 33 2.1
8. DIGGINS, Skylar-ND SO 16 32 2.0
9. ROBERTS, Symone-PC SO 15 29 1.9
10. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 30 1.9
McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ SO 16 30 1.9
12. FARIS, Kelly-UCONN SO 16 29 1.8
NOVOSEL, Natalie-ND JR 16 29 1.8
MORROW, Erica-SU SR 16 29 1.8
MAGEE, Tia-GU JR 16 29 1.8
 
3-POINT FG PCT Cl GP 3FG 3FGA Pct
1. MALLORY, Brittany-ND SR 16 22 47 .468
2. DOOMES-STEPHENS, Le-USF 15 17 37 .459
3. HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN FR 16 33 75 .440
4. HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN JR 16 25 57 .439
5. BURAKOSKI, Amanda-STJ SO 16 28 64 .438
6. QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU SR 16 32 80 .400
HALL, Elashier-SU SO 16 20 50 .400
8. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 43 113 .381
9. BURKE, Becky-LOU JR 16 29 77 .377
WHEELER, Erica-RU SO 16 29 77 .377
11. CREW, Jasmine-SHU JR 15 18 48 .375
12. HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU JR 16 31 83 .373
13. ULIS, Shareese-CIN SR 16 44 118 .373
14. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 24 65 .369
15. REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 35 95 .368
 
3-POINT FG MADE Cl GP 3FG Avg/G
1. RODGERS, Sugar-GU SO 16 47 2.9
2. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 43 2.9
3. KIMMEL, Lindsay-VU JR 16 45 2.8
4. ULIS, Shareese-CIN SR 16 44 2.8
5. SCHIMMEL, Shoni-LOU FR 16 41 2.6
6. REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 35 2.2
7. SYKES, April-RU JR 16 34 2.1
8. HARTLEY, Bria-UCONN FR 16 33 2.1
HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT SR 16 33 2.1
MCNUTT, Monica-GU SR 16 33 2.1
11. QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU SR 16 32 2.0
12. HAMPTON, Keisha-DPU JR 16 31 1.9
13. WHEELER, Erica-RU SO 16 29 1.8
BURKE, Becky-LOU JR 16 29 1.8
15. BURAKOSKI, Amanda-STJ SO 16 28 1.8
 
BLOCKED SHOTS Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. COLE, Chelsea-PITT SR 16 33 2.1
ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 33 2.1
3. PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 30 1.9
4. OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 27 1.7
HARRY, Katherine-DPU SO 16 27 1.7
6. BUSSIE,Asya-WVU SO 16 26 1.6
SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 26 1.6
8. LEE, Chelsey-RU JR 16 25 1.6
9. MC DONALD, Akila-USF 14 20 1.4
10. REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 22 1.4
11. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 19 1.2
HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC SR 16 19 1.2
VAILS, Sheronne-LOU FR 16 19 1.2
14. SCOTT, Shayla-PITT SR 16 17 1.1
DOLSON, Stefanie-UCONN FR 16 17 1.1
 
ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO Cl GP Assists Avg T-Overs Avg Ratio
1. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 75 4.7 37 2.3 2.0
2. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 96 6.0 52 3.3 1.8
3. DIXON, Lorin-UCONN SR 16 49 3.1 27 1.7 1.8
4. MARTIN, Anna-DPU SO 16 45 2.8 26 1.6 1.7
5. FARIS, Kelly-UCONN SO 16 62 3.9 39 2.4 1.6
6. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 76 4.8 51 3.2 1.5
7. HAYES, Tiffany-UCONN JR 16 52 3.3 36 2.3 1.4
8. MALLORY, Brittany-ND SR 16 49 3.1 34 2.1 1.4
9. QUIGLEY, Sam-DPU SR 16 62 3.9 44 2.8 1.4
10. McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ SO 16 85 5.3 64 4.0 1.3
11. WELLS, Lola-PC JR 16 53 3.3 40 2.5 1.3
12. WRIGHT, Rubylee-GU JR 16 89 5.6 68 4.3 1.3
13. HARRIS, Tasha-SU SR 16 61 3.8 51 3.2 1.2
14. MILES,Sarah-WVU SR 15 65 4.3 55 3.7 1.2
15. DIGGINS, Skylar-ND SO 16 73 4.6 63 3.9 1.2
 
OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. GRANT, Porche-USF 14 53 3.8
2. COLE, Chelsea-PITT SR 16 58 3.6
3. WRIGHT, Teya-PC SR 16 55 3.4
PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 55 3.4
5. HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU JR 16 47 2.9
6. CHESTER, Felicia-DPU SR 16 45 2.8
7. RANDOLPH, Jeanise-CIN FR 16 43 2.7
REID, Monique-LOU JR 16 43 2.7
ALEXANDER, Kayla-SU SO 16 43 2.7
10. DOOMES-STEPHENS, Le-USF 15 40 2.7
11. BUSSIE,Asya-WVU SO 16 42 2.6
12. CRAWFORD, Adria-GU JR 15 38 2.5
13. ASHMEADE, Tajay-SHU JR 16 40 2.5
PIKES, Taylor-DPU JR 16 40 2.5
OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 40 2.5
ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 40 2.5
HINES, Keshia-LOU SR 16 40 2.5
 
DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. COLE, Chelsea-PITT SR 16 111 6.9
2. FARIS, Kelly-UCONN SO 16 93 5.8
3. MOORE, Maya-UCONN SR 16 86 5.4
4. SWEENEY, Laura-VU SO 16 83 5.2
5. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 80 5.0
6. LEE, Chelsey-RU JR 16 75 4.7
7. HANKINS, Mi-Khida-PC SR 16 74 4.6
8. ALI,Madina-WVU SR 16 73 4.6
9. McKENITH, Nadirah-STJ SO 16 72 4.5
10. PETERS, Devereaux-ND SR 16 71 4.4
11. SCOTT, Shayla-PITT SR 16 70 4.4
12. HEMINGWAY, Iasia-SU JR 16 67 4.2
ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 67 4.2
14. WRIGHT, Teya-PC SR 16 64 4.0
OLIVER, Monique-RU SO 16 64 4.0
 
MINUTES PLAYED Cl GP Minutes Avg/G
1. ROBINSON, Angel-MU SR 16 606 37.9
2. McMORRIS, Tatiyiana-MU SR 15 550 36.7
3. ULIS, Shareese-CIN SR 16 584 36.5
4. REPELLA,Liz-WVU SR 16 583 36.4
5. SYKES, April-RU JR 16 571 35.7
6. RUSHDAN, Khadijah-RU JR 16 569 35.6
7. SMITH, Andrea-USF 16 564 35.2
8. HARRISON, Taneisha-PITT SR 16 556 34.8
9. COOK, Kayla-CIN FR 16 554 34.6
10. RODGERS, Sugar-GU SO 16 552 34.5
 


TEAM IDENTIFICATION Team ID
Cincinnati CIN
Connecticut UCONN
DePaul DPU
Georgetown GU
Louisville LOU
Marquette MU
Notre Dame ND
Pittsburgh PITT
Providence PC
Rutgers RU
Seton Hall SHU
St. John's STJ
Syracuse SU
USF USF
Villanova VU
West Virginia WVU