2010 BIG EAST Women's Lacrosse

Overall Statistics


 

CONFERENCE LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 17 250 14.71
2. Georgetown 19 254 13.37
3. Syracuse 22 287 13.05
4. Loyola (Md.) 18 231 12.83
5. Rutgers 16 199 12.44
6. Villanova 16 186 11.62
7. Connecticut 17 189 11.12
8. Notre Dame 18 197 10.94
9. Cincinnati 17 167 9.82
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 22 160 7.27
2. Rutgers 16 90 5.62
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 96 5.33
4. Notre Dame 18 90 5.00
5. Louisville 17 82 4.82
6. Villanova 16 76 4.75
7. Georgetown 19 90 4.74
8. Cincinnati 17 78 4.59
9. Connecticut 17 71 4.18
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 17 361 21.24
2. Cincinnati 17 351 20.65
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 343 19.06
4. Notre Dame 18 331 18.39
5. Connecticut 17 296 17.41
6. Rutgers 16 269 16.81
7. Georgetown 19 319 16.79
8. Syracuse 22 330 15.00
9. Villanova 16 230 14.38
 
POINTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 22 447 20.32
2. Louisville 17 332 19.53
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 327 18.17
4. Georgetown 19 344 18.11
5. Rutgers 16 289 18.06
6. Villanova 16 262 16.38
7. Notre Dame 18 287 15.94
8. Connecticut 17 260 15.29
9. Cincinnati 17 245 14.41
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 17 262 15.41
2. Villanova 16 224 14.00
3. Connecticut 17 226 13.29
4. Loyola (Md.) 18 238 13.22
5. Rutgers 16 211 13.19
6. Georgetown 19 246 12.95
7. Syracuse 22 271 12.32
8. Notre Dame 18 212 11.78
9. Cincinnati 17 189 11.12
 
FOULS/GAME Cl GP No. Avg/G
1. Rutgers 16 464 29.00
2. Cincinnati 17 486 28.59
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 487 27.06
4. Louisville 17 419 24.65
5. Georgetown 19 442 23.26
6. Syracuse 22 467 21.23
7. Notre Dame 18 364 20.22
8. Villanova 16 271 16.94
9. Connecticut 17 270 15.88
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 17 575 33.82
2. Georgetown 19 584 30.74
3. Syracuse 22 642 29.18
4. Loyola (Md.) 18 514 28.56
5. Villanova 16 450 28.12
6. Notre Dame 18 505 28.06
7. Rutgers 16 419 26.19
8. Connecticut 17 429 25.24
9. Cincinnati 17 374 22.00
 
SHOT PERCENT GP Goals Shots Pct.
1. Rutgers 16 199 419 .475
2. Loyola (Md.) 18 231 514 .449
3. Syracuse 22 287 642 .447
4. Cincinnati 17 167 374 .447
5. Connecticut 17 189 429 .441
6. Georgetown 19 254 584 .435
7. Louisville 17 250 575 .435
8. Villanova 16 186 450 .413
9. Notre Dame 18 197 505 .390
 
TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Syracuse 22 314 14.27
2. Georgetown 19 272 14.32
3. Louisville 17 271 15.94
4. Villanova 16 271 16.94
5. Connecticut 17 288 16.94
6. Rutgers 16 275 17.19
7. Loyola (Md.) 18 312 17.33
8. Notre Dame 18 317 17.61
9. Cincinnati 17 357 21.00
 
CAUSED TURNOVER/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Loyola (Md.) 18 235 13.06
2. Louisville 17 186 10.94
3. Georgetown 19 205 10.79
4. Notre Dame 18 184 10.22
5. Rutgers 16 151 9.44
6. Syracuse 22 197 8.95
7. Cincinnati 17 121 7.12
8. Connecticut 17 90 5.29
9. Villanova 16 75 4.69
 
GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Syracuse 22 195 1332:58 8.78
2. Notre Dame 18 181 1116:20 9.73
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 178 1093:54 9.76
4. Rutgers 16 163 975:46 10.02
5. Louisville 17 185 1019:54 10.88
6. Georgetown 19 212 1149:45 11.06
7. Connecticut 17 193 1024:07 11.31
8. Villanova 16 194 966:00 12.05
9. Cincinnati 17 229 1042:13 13.18
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Notre Dame 18 1 0.06
2. Loyola (Md.) 18 0 0.00
Rutgers 16 0 0.00
Louisville 17 0 0.00
Georgetown 19 0 0.00
Connecticut 17 0 0.00
Villanova 16 0 0.00
Cincinnati 17 0 0.00
Syracuse 22 0 0.00
 
SAVES/GAME GP Saves Avg/G
1. Cincinnati 17 189 11.12
2. Rutgers 16 159 9.94
3. Syracuse 22 211 9.59
4. Louisville 17 153 9.00
5. Loyola (Md.) 18 159 8.83
6. Georgetown 19 148 7.79
7. Notre Dame 18 132 7.33
8. Connecticut 17 124 7.29
9. Villanova 16 111 6.94
 
SAVE PERCENT GP GA Saves Save%
1. Syracuse 22 195 211 .520
2. Rutgers 16 163 159 .494
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 178 159 .472
4. Louisville 17 185 153 .453
5. Cincinnati 17 229 189 .452
6. Notre Dame 18 181 132 .422
7. Georgetown 19 212 148 .411
8. Connecticut 17 193 124 .391
9. Villanova 16 194 111 .364
 
SHOTS ON GOAL/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Louisville 17 439 25.82
2. Georgetown 19 433 22.79
3. Loyola (Md.) 18 395 21.94
4. Syracuse 22 476 21.64
5. Notre Dame 18 384 21.33
6. Villanova 16 322 20.12
7. Rutgers 16 314 19.62
8. Connecticut 17 326 19.18
9. Cincinnati 17 292 17.18
 


Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Georgetown 8-0 1.000 130 80   13-6 .684 254 212
Syracuse 6-2 .750 108 56   15-7 .682 287 195
Notre Dame 6-2 .750 96 62   11-7 .611 197 181
Loyola (Md.) 5-3 .625 114 83   11-7 .611 231 178
Rutgers 4-4 .500 99 103   11-5 .688 199 163
Louisville 4-4 .500 104 93   11-6 .647 250 185
Connecticut 2-6 .250 69 107   9-8 .529 189 193
Villanova 1-7 .125 61 129   8-8 .500 186 194
Cincinnati 0-8 .000 65 133   5-12 .294 167 229
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
Louisville 2 2-0
Rutgers 1 1-0
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Margin Shot% Save% GB DC TO CT Pen-PIM
Cincinnati 17 167-229 -3.6 .447 .452 351 189 357 121 7-13.5
Connecticut 17 189-193 -0.2 .441 .391 296 226 288 90 0-0.0
Georgetown 19 254-212 +2.2 .435 .411 319 246 272 205 1-3.0
Louisville 17 250-185 +3.8 .435 .453 361 262 271 186 27-81.0
Loyola (Md.) 18 231-178 +2.9 .449 .472 343 238 312 235 5-15.0
Notre Dame 18 197-181 +0.9 .390 .422 331 212 317 184 0-0.0
Rutgers 16 199-163 +2.2 .475 .494 269 211 275 151 0-0.0
Syracuse 22 287-195 +4.2 .447 .520 330 271 314 197 8-24.0
Villanova 16 186-194 -0.5 .413 .364 230 224 271 75 0-0.0
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
Cincinnati 8-1708 214   9-2007 223   0-0 0   17-3715 219
Connecticut 10-2347 235   7-2422 346   0-0 0   17-4769 281
Georgetown 10-7670 767   9-3849 428   0-0 0   19-11519 606
Louisville 7-1930 276   10-3237 324   0-0 0   17-5167 304
Loyola (Md.) 7-3983 569   11-3032 276   0-0 0   18-7015 390
Notre Dame 8-4081 510   10-4552 455   0-0 0   18-8633 480
Rutgers 8-1758 220   8-3879 485   0-0 0   16-5637 352
Syracuse 9-4068 452   11-6222 566   2-117 58   22-10407 473
Villanova 8-1510 189   8-1834 229   0-0 0   16-3344 209
Totals 75-29055 387   83-31034 374   2-117 58   160-60206 376  
 

 

INDIVIDUAL LACROSSE STATISTICS

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games.

GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 17 78 4.59
2. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 64 3.56
3. DOVE, Christina-SU 22 69 3.14
4. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 12 36 3.00
5. DONODEO, Justine-VU 16 47 2.94
6. CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 16 44 2.75
7. LOVEJOY, Liz-LOU 17 46 2.71
SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 17 46 2.71
9. FORD, Molly-GU 19 51 2.68
10. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 17 41 2.41
 
ASSISTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 17 46 2.71
2. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 22 48 2.18
3. RYBINSKI, Erica-VU 16 29 1.81
4. TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 22 37 1.68
5. KIRIAZOGLOU, Katie-CIN 17 27 1.59
6. TAMASITIS, Maggie-ND 18 26 1.44
7. Flanagan, Meghan-RU 16 23 1.44
8. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 18 24 1.33
9. FORD, Molly-GU 19 25 1.32
10. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 23 1.28
 
POINTS/GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 17 78 6 84 4.94
2. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 64 23 87 4.83
3. OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 17 29 46 75 4.41
4. DOVE, Christina-SU 22 69 28 97 4.41
5. LADOUCEUR, Tee-SU 22 43 48 91 4.14
6. FORD, Molly-GU 19 51 25 76 4.00
7. CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 16 44 17 61 3.81
8. DONODEO, Justine-VU 16 47 10 57 3.56
9. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 18 39 24 63 3.50
RYBINSKI, Erica-VU 16 27 29 56 3.50
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 5 0.28
DOVE, Christina-SU 22 5 0.23
3. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 12 3 0.25
WELSH, Marlena-RU 16 3 0.19
DONODEO, Justine-VU 16 3 0.19
CANTWELL, Brooke-RU 16 3 0.19
OLIVERIO, Katie-LOU 17 3 0.18
GILES, Jacqueline-GU 19 3 0.16
KAESTNER, Ashby-GU 19 3 0.16
TUMOLO, Michelle-SU 22 3 0.14
QUILLINAN, Halley-SU 22 3 0.14
 
GROUND BALLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 18 53 2.94
2. HOGAN, Liz-SU 22 64 2.91
3. KING, Ashley-LOU 17 48 2.82
4. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 17 44 2.59
5. RYAN, Meghan-LOU 17 42 2.47
 
SHOTS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 17 176 10.35
2. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 131 7.28
3. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 12 87 7.25
4. BOBAL, Lianne-LOU 9 61 6.78
5. DOVE, Christina-SU 22 143 6.50
6. DONODEO, Justine-VU 16 102 6.38
7. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 17 102 6.00
8. BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 18 104 5.78
9. SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 17 96 5.65
10. SCIOSCIA, Gina-ND 18 100 5.56
 
DRAW CONTROLS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 17 63 3.71
2. GIUST, Shawna-VU 16 45 2.81
3. REHFUSS,Abby-LOY 18 48 2.67
4. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 12 31 2.58
5. KAESTNER, Ashby-GU 19 49 2.58
 
CAUSED TURNOVERS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DOHERTY, Jackie-ND 18 40 2.22
2. GIBSON,Emily-LOY 18 36 2.00
BLANEY, Shaylyn-ND 18 36 2.00
4. HENEBERRY,Ana-LOY 18 35 1.94
5. DASHIELL, Emily-LOU 17 30 1.76
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG (Max. 20.00) GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 22 191 1327:31 8.63
2. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 18 155 982:24 9.47
3. HILLING, Ellie-ND 18 180 1114:03 9.69
4. KALATA, Lily-RU 16 142 863:07 9.87
5. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 17 178 964:09 11.08
6. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 19 202 1073:21 11.29
7. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 17 191 1003:49 11.42
8. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 16 152 745:47 12.23
9. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 17 200 907:55 13.22
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. HOGAN, Liz-SU 22 211 191 .525
2. KALATA, Lily-RU 16 147 142 .509
3. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 18 153 155 .497
4. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 17 175 200 .467
5. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 17 145 178 .449
6. HILLING, Ellie-ND 18 131 180 .421
7. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 19 145 202 .418
8. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 17 123 191 .392
9. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 16 92 152 .377
 
SAVES/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. RUSSO, Katherine-CIN 17 175 10.29
2. HOGAN, Liz-SU 22 211 9.59
3. KALATA, Lily-RU 16 147 9.19
4. PAWLIW, Danielle-LOU 17 145 8.53
5. STOOTHOFF,Kerry-LOY 18 153 8.50
6. FORMBY, Caitlin-GU 19 145 7.63
7. HILLING, Ellie-ND 18 131 7.28
8. MOULTON, Jenna-UCONN 17 123 7.24
9. LANGAN, Maggie-VU 16 92 5.75
 
SHUTOUTS/GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. HILLING, Ellie-ND 18 1 0.06
 
FREE-POSITION GOALS/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. GAVIN,Grace-LOY 18 15 0.83
2. LAPHAM, M.E.-UCONN 12 9 0.75
3. BOBAL, Lianne-LOU 9 6 0.67
4. FOLEY, Bergan-LOU 17 11 0.65
SIMANSKI, Laura-CIN 17 11 0.65
 
Team Identification Team ID
Cincinnati CIN
Connecticut UCONN
Georgetown GU
Louisville LOU
Loyola (Md.) LOY
Notre Dame ND
Rutgers RU
Syracuse SU
Villanova VU